
- #JABREF SEARCH ADD BOOK HOW TO#
- #JABREF SEARCH ADD BOOK CODE#
If not using JabRef, Zotero, a plain text editor and Mendeley are the most popularĪmong the 20% not using JabRef as their primary bibliographic software, numerous alternatives are cited, and the reasons are:
For the other 20%, either JabRef is their secondary bibliographic software, or they do not use JabRef. For 80% of the responders, JabRef is the main bibliographic software. #JABREF SEARCH ADD BOOK HOW TO#
How to mobilize the users? How JabRef is currently used JabRef is their primary bibliographic software Only 20% of responders would not make a finantial contribution to foster JabRef development (among the 337 responders).Ĭonclusion: money could be raised. How to mobilize them? Money donations are to be expected
#JABREF SEARCH ADD BOOK CODE#
Time is money, and money is time Code contribution are to be expectedĪ third of responders could contribute code (among the 346 responders).Ĭonclusion: a large base of coders for JabRef development. 59 responders).Ĭonclusion: A webinar will boost the attendance.
16% would attend an online JabCon webinar instead (i.e. 8% will possibly or definitely attend (i.e. What contribution to expect from users JabCon JabRef users are willing to attend.Īmong the 100 responders who detailed their interest into attending JabCon, 85% are users.Ĭonclusion: Many inputs from users to expect. Adding mathematics, chemistry, economics makes 2/3. Physics, computer sciences, engineering and biology makes about 50%. Humanities and social sciences represent “only” about 15% of usage. Natural sciences, formal sciences and professions are the dominant fields of activity of the responders. Half of use is for studies (including PhD).Ĭonclusion: a wide variety of contexts! A few field of activity dominates. More than half of JabRef use is done in a context of professional work. English speakers represented (only) 25% of responders.Ĭontext of use is mostly professional, but many usages. German were the most numerous responders. Who are the JabRef users German and English speakers are the most numerous among the responders What contribution to expect from users. The analysis of the results is structured in the following order: Total, we got 428 responses, which included 31 incomplete responses. What do you think about the current features?. The survey consisted of 3 sets of questions: We were interested in getting the opinion of community members.
To foster its developments, the JabRef core team has carried out an online survey from Octoto November 14, 2015.
Result analysis of JabRef survey Introduction